Apex 3 Blog
A blog to offer ideas, suggestions and techniques to turn around or fix troubled or failed IT projects

Thoughts on the Eve of 2012 ...

by Mark Davison December 30. 2011 15:22

Personal Note From Mark Davison As We Enter 2012

I want to wish all readers of my blog a happy and healthy new year.  Looking back on 2011, I was thinking about the year just past, and how it was.  Many thoughts run through my mind - challenges and opportunities, accomplishments and achievements, but also disappointments and sadness – a reminder that this year like all others was filled with moments to celebrate and others that will be remembered with some pain.  Hopefully my writings here in the blog have been helpful to many of you who are seeking to find interesting reading, tips, suggestions and ideas on consulting, project management, working with people, and achieving successful outcomes.  

Whether your year has been a good one or not, in 2012 I encourage you to try to build on your successes, using them as a foundation to be even more successful and to do more good in the coming year.  Similarly, take some time to think about and learn from your disappointments and mistakes, and try to do things differently next year so you can get different results.  Finally, keep learning and pushing yourself to higher levels of accomplishment, and remember the following 5 “short lessons of interaction”  when dealing with others … to be flexible, tolerant, patient, understanding and nice - as you enter 2012.  Inspire others to do the same!  

Happy New Year!

Tags:

Project Lessons Learned – Part 3 Human Factors

by Mark Davison December 15. 2011 22:23

Project Lessons Learned – Part 3

Human Factors

These points build on previous blogs about the benefits of looking backward over projects to see what we’ve learned.  In this post I share some questions that focus on the human aspects of a project.  The answers can provide insights into what to do/not do on the next project.

  • Was the project organization effective?
  • Did the project manager have the right reporting relationships?  Why or why not?
  • How effectively did the organization support the project?
  • How effective was the project manager?
  • How effective was the staffing of the project team?
  • What training was provided?
  • What skills and experience were lacking on the project team?
  • How effective was the project team in achieving the goals and objectives?
  • How well did the team members work with each other?
  • How well did the team members work with others – internal and external?
  • How effective were project communications within the project team?
  • Did the team have sufficient resources?
  • How effective was the team in making and honoring commitments?
  • What types of conflicts came up?  How were they resolved within the team?
  • How effective was the team in resolving conflicts?
  • How effective was the team in obtaining cooperation of end users and functional areas?
  • How did the team exercise authority over resources and commitments to meet objectives?
  • How did the team create accountability to assure meeting targets and deadlines?

 

Tags:

Project Lessons Learned – Part 2 Project Execution and Delivery

by Mark Davison December 13. 2011 17:13

Project Lessons Learned – Part 2

Project Execution and Delivery

Almost all of our projects benefit from looking backward over the project life cycle to see what we’ve learned.  In this post I want to share some questions that can be asked about the execution and delivery aspects of a project.  The answers can provide insights into what to do/not do on the next project.

  • Did the project stick to its original goals?
  • How manageable were changes in direction?
  • How well managed were project baselines around scope, time and budget?
  • How well were design changes managed?
  • How well were risks managed?
  • How well were issues managed?
  • Was progress tracked against baselines?
  • How frequently was progress reported?  To whom?
  • How well were internal resources managed?  How were they held accountable for accomplishments and deliverables?  Did they meet requirements for budget, schedule, quality and performance?
  • How well were contracted vendors managed?  How were they held accountable for accomplishments and deliverables?  Did they meet requirements for budget, schedule, quality and performance?
  • How well were stakeholders satisfied?
  • How well did the deliverables and results satisfy the requirements, goals and objectives? 

Tags:

Recent CMS Statement Covering Enforcement Discretion for HIPAA Transaction Compliance

by Mark Davison December 11. 2011 17:55

For our Healthcare Clients:  We republish the following CMS Statement released November 17, 2011, regarding the 90 day period of enforcement discretion for compliance with new HIPAA Transaction Standards...

 

CMS STATEMENT   

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE        

Thursday, November 17, 2011                           

 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Office of E-Health Standards and Services Announces 90-Day 

Period of Enforcement Discretion for Compliance with New HIPAA Transaction Standards 

 

Today the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Office of E-Health Standards and Services (OESS) 

announced that it would not initiate enforcement action until March 31, 2012, with respect to any HIPAA covered 

entity that is not in compliance  with the ASC X12 Version 5010 (Version 5010), NCPDP Telecom D.0 (NCPDP 

D.0) and NCPDP Medicaid Subrogation 3.0 (NCPDP 3.0) standards. Notwithstanding OESS’ discretionary 

application of its enforcement authority, the compliance date for use of these new standards remains January 1, 

2012 (small health plans have until January 1, 2013 to comply with NCPDP 3.0). 

 

CMS’ Office of E-Health Standards and Services is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ 

component that enforces compliance with HIPAA transaction and code set standards. 

 

OESS encourages all covered entities to continue working with their trading partners to become compliant 

with the new HIPAA standards, and to determine their readiness to accept the new standards as of January 1, 2012.  

While enforcement action will not be taken, OESS will continue to accept complaints associated with compliance 

with Version 5010, NCPDP D.0 and NCPDP 3.0 transaction standards during the 90-day period beginning January 

1, 2012.  If requested by OESS, covered entities that are the subject of complaints (known as “filed-against 

entities”) must produce evidence of either compliance or a good faith effort to become compliant with the new 

HIPAA standards during the 90-day period.   

 

OESS made the decision for a discretionary enforcement period based on industry feedback revealing that, 

with only about 45 days remaining before the January 1, 2012 compliance date, testing between some covered 

entities and their trading partners has not yet reached a threshold whereby a majority of covered entities would be 

able to be in compliance by January 1.  Feedback indicates that the number of submitters, the volume of 

transactions, and other testing data used as indicators of the industry’s readiness to comply with the new standards 

have been low across some industry sectors.  OESS has also received reports that many covered entities are still 

awaiting software upgrades.   

 

Version 5010, NCPDP Telecom D.0 and NCPDP Medicaid Subrogation 3.0 standards represent significant 

improvement over the current standard versions.   NCPDP Telecom D.0 addresses certain pharmacy industry needs.  

NCPDP Medicaid Subrogation 3.0 allows state Medicaid programs to recoup payments for pharmacy services in 

cases where a third party payer has primary financial responsibility.   Version 5010 in particular provides more 

functionality for transactions such as eligibility requests and health care claims status   Implementation of Version 

5010 also is a prerequisite for using the updated ICD-10 CM diagnosis and ICD-10-PCS inpatient procedure code 

set in electronic health care transactions effective October 1, 2013.  

 

Links to information on Version 5010, NCPDP D.0 and NCPDP 3.0 are available at www.cms.gov/ICD10 

 

By:  

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 

Room 352-G 

200 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC  20201 

Tags:

Apex3 Holiday Party / Open House for our Atlanta Area Clients, Friends, Families and Colleagues Please Join Us on Decemvber 12 at the new Microsoft Store at Lenox Square Shopping Mall from 7-10 pm ...

by Mark Davison December 1. 2011 16:09

Tags:

Month List

Tag cloud

    ContactUs About Services Industries About Services